Posts Tagged ‘prison rules’

Religion In Public Life News |

Colo. appeals court revives prisoner’s Ramadan case

Patrick Portley-El says his rights were violated when state prison officials prevented him from observing the Muslim holiday.

Speech Analysis |

Court: Isolated mail interference doesn’t violate inmates’ rights

Ruling in Pennsylvania prisoner’s case, 3rd Circuit says inmates must show a pattern of interference with the mail in order to prove a First Amendment violation.

Religion News • Speech News |

9th Circuit rejects inmate’s challenge to typewriter ban

Panel cites 2011 ruling in determining that Nevada’s policy is reasonably related to prison-safety concerns.

Religion In Public Life News |

S.D. prison tobacco ban burdens inmates’ religious rights

Federal judge finds that even if state officials had asserted a compelling government interest, they didn’t prove the ban was the least-restrictive means of furthering that interest.

Speech News |

Conn. prison can censor Hells Angels mail

Federal judge rejects Daniel Klimas’ free-speech claim that corrections officials’ actions constituted an ‘exaggerated response’ to security concerns.

Religion In Public Life News |

‘American Taliban’ seeks group prayer in Ind. prison

Trial starts today in lawsuit claiming prison officials are violating John Walker Lindh’s religious rights by preventing inmates from praying together daily.

Speech News |

Inmate loses First Amendment claim over ban of The Pill Book

Federal judge concludes that prisons have ‘a legitimate purpose in restricting prisoners from owning books containing drug-related information, even for health purposes.’

Religion In Public Life News |

Dismissal recommended for inmate’s race-based religion claims

Federal magistrate says California prisoner failed to show how having a nonwhite cellmate burdens the practice of his religion under the First Amendment.

Speech Commentary |

5th Circuit upholds prison book censorship in Texas

Prison policies to promote inmate safety and rehabilitation are legitimate, but censoring books irrationally and inconsistently isn’t.

Religion Analysis |

Court revives inmate’s claim against no-beard policy

4th Circuit panel says prison failed to explain why a Muslim prisoner’s 1/8-inch beard worn for religious reasons would pose a problem.

Speech Analysis |

9th Circuit rejects inmate’s free-speech claim

Appeals court avoids First Amendment issue, falling back on granting qualified immunity to Oregon prison officials.

Speech Commentary |

Federal judge sanctions confiscation of inmate’s book

California case involving book by famous inmate George L. Jackson is another in a long line of rulings that unnecessarily restrict prisoners’ First Amendment rights.

Speech Analysis |

2 inmates lose phone-related lawsuits in federal court

In cases from Arkansas and California, courts rule that the First Amendment doesn’t require prisons to provide telephone service.

Speech News |

Federal judge: Va. prisons’ CD policy violates free expression

Man challenged policy, which allows inmates to have only approved music and faith-based spoken-word CDs, after he was prevented from giving an inmate a disc by writer Dylan Thomas.

Speech News |

S.C. county to pay almost $600K to settle jail-censorship suit

Prison Legal News editors contend that this is the largest-ever settlement for such a case.

« Older Entries |

About The First Amendment Center

We support the First Amendment and build understanding of its core freedoms through education, information and entertainment.

The center serves as a forum for the study and exploration of free-expression issues, including freedom of speech, of the press and of religion, and the rights to assemble and to petition the government.

Founded by John Seigenthaler, the First Amendment Center is an operating program of the Freedom Forum and is associated with the Newseum and the Diversity Institute. The center has offices in the John Seigenthaler Center at Vanderbilt University in Nashville, Tenn., and at the Newseum in Washington, D.C.

The center’s programs, including the Religious Freedom Education Project at the Newseum, provide education and information to the public and groups including First Amendment scholars and experts, educators, government policy makers, legal experts and students. The center is nonpartisan and does not lobby, litigate or provide legal advice. See First Amendment Center Fact Sheet and FAQs. See internships info.

The center’s website, www.firstamendmentcenter.org, is one of the most authoritative sources of news, information and commentary in the nation on First Amendment issues. It features daily updates on news about First Amendment-related developments, as well as detailed reports about U.S. Supreme Court cases involving the First Amendment, and commentary, analysis and special reports on free expression, press freedom and religious-liberty issues. Support the work of the First Amendment Center.

1 For All

1 for All is a national nonpartisan program designed to build understanding and support for First Amendment freedoms. 1 for All provides teaching materials to the nation’s schools, supports educational events on America’s campuses and reminds the public that the First Amendment serves everyone, regardless of faith, race, gender or political leanings. It is truly one amendment for all. Visit 1 for All at http://1forall.us/

Help tomorrow’s citizens find their voice: Teach the First Amendment

The most basic liberties guaranteed to Americans – embodied in the 45 words of the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution – assure Americans a government that is responsible to its citizens and responsive to their wishes.

These 45 words are as alive and important today as they were more than 200 years ago. These liberties are neither liberal nor conservative, Democratic nor Republican – they are the basis for our representative democratic form of government.

We know from studies beginning in 1997 by the nonpartisan First Amendment Center, and from studies commissioned by the Knight Foundation and others, that few adult Americans or high school students can name the individual five freedoms that make up the First Amendment.

The lesson plans – drawn from materials prepared by the Newseum and the First Amendment Center – will draw young people into an exploration of how their freedoms began and how they operate in today’s world. Students will discuss just how far individual rights extend, examining rights in the school environment and public places. The lessons may be used in history and government, civics, language arts and journalism, art and debate classes. They may be used in sections or in their entirety. Many of these lesson plans indicate an overall goal, offer suggestions on how to teach the lesson and list additional resources and enrichment activities.

See more about lesson plans.

First Amendment Moot Court Competition

The First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution – the cornerstone of American democracy – is the focus of the National First Amendment Moot Court Competition. Recognized as one of the nation's finest constitutional-law competitions, this annual event features a current First Amendment controversy.

During the two-day competition in February, each team will participate in a minimum of four rounds, arguing a hypothetical based on a current First Amendment controversy before panels of accomplished jurists, legal scholars and attorneys.

Past participants in the National First Amendment Moot Court Competition have represented law schools nationwide, from Brooklyn Law School to Duke University to Arizona State to Harvard.

The 23rd Annual National First Amendment Moot Court Competition is Feb. 21-22, 2013. See registration information and details about the competition.

FIRST AMENDMENT CENTER ARCHIVES

State of the First Amendment survey reports

The State of the First Amendment surveys, commissioned since 1997 by the First Amendment Center and Newseum, are a regular check on how Americans view their first freedoms of speech, press, assembly, religion and petition.

The periodic surveys examine public attitudes toward freedom of speech, press, religion and the rights of assembly and petition; and sample public opinion on contemporary issues involving those freedoms. See the reports.