overviewfrequently asked questionscases & resources
  FAQs >
 
What’s the First Amendment issue with legislation against cyberstalking?
 
Why should ‘virtual’ child pornography be thought of any differently than child pornography?
 
What about using images from other Web sites on my own site?
 
Can I use a company's logo for a parody Web site?
 
Has Congress stepped in to change the laws regarding copyright and the Internet?
 
What are 'gripe sites' or 'cybergripers'?
 
Why is the concept of 'local community standards' difficult to apply to the Internet?
 
Do 'gripe sites' violate federal trademark laws?
 
What is the Federal Trademark Dilution Act of 1996?
 
 

The law provides a cause of action for trademark owners if they can establish the following:

  1. They own a famous mark (determined by eight factors listed in the law).
  2. The defendant is making commercial use in interstate commerce of the plaintiff’s mark or trade name.
  3. The defendant’s use of plaintiff’s mark occurred after the mark became famous.
  4. The defendant’s use causes dilution of plaintiff’s mark by lessening the capacity of a famous mark to identify and distinguish goods or services.

The law exempts noncommercial use of trademarks. The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals explained in its 1998 decision in Bally Total Fitness Holding Corporation v. Faber that “commercial use is an essential element of any dilution claim.”

However, some courts appear to take a broad view of what constitutes commercial activity. For example, a federal district court in New York ruled in 1997 in Planned Parenthood Federation of America, Inc. v. Bucci that a radio host and anti-abortion activist who had a Web site with the domain name www.plannedparenthood.com engaged in commercial activity for several reasons. These include that fact that the radio host promoted his book on the site, solicited funds for his nonprofit political activism, and designed it to harm Planned Parenthood commercially. The court explained:

Finally, defendant’s use is commercial because of its effect on plaintiff’s activities. First, defendant has appropriated plaintiff’s mark in order to reach an audience of Internet users who want to reach plaintiff’s services and viewpoint, intercepting them and misleading them in an attempt to offer his own political message. Second, defendant’s appropriation not only provides Internet users with competing and directly opposing information, but also prevents those users from reaching plaintiff and its services and message. In that way, defendant’s use is classically competitive: he has taken plaintiff’s mark as his own in order to purvey his Internet services — his Web site — to an audience intending to access plaintiff’s services.

 
 
I got kicked off AOL for cursing in several messages. Doesn’t that violate my free speech?
 
What is the Anti-Cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act of 1999 and does it prohibit gripe sites?
 
Are there laws prohibiting spam?
 
Does using filters to block parts of the Internet violate the First Amendment?
 
Internet filters give librarians control in order to protect children from harmful material. What’s the objection?
 
Can public schools use Internet filters to block students' access to specific Web sites?
 
Could the president sue me if I posted a message critical of him?
 
Can’t patrons ask librarians to override filters when mistakes are made?
 
Aren't ISPs required to conceal their clients' identities?
 
Who is affected by the U.S. v. ALA ruling?
 
How much influence do private companies have over access?
 
Some states have laws against SLAPPs. Do they apply to online libel lawsuits?
 
Would filtering the Internet at public colleges and universities violate the First Amendment?
 
After U.S. v. ALA, are there any other legal options?
 
What is a blog?
 
Does blogging raise First Amendment issues?
 
Can public employees be disciplined for the content of their blogs?
 
What would be wrong with banning all child pornography, virtual or real?
 
Has Congress ever tried to prohibit hate speech on the Internet?
 
View All Answers    Clear All Answers
 
print this   Print


Last system update: Saturday, November 21, 2009 | 09:03:42
 SEARCH  MORE
Internet & First Amendment issues >
Filtering
Indecency online
Spam
Cybersquatting
Online libel
Hate speech online
Virtual child pornography
Copyright, P2P & Google
Cyberstalking
Blogging