Part of Calif. human-trafficking initiative put on hold
SACRAMENTO, Calif. — A federal judge has blocked part of a voter-approved ballot initiative related to human trafficking until a court hearing can be held later this month.
The decision temporarily halts a provision of Proposition 35 that requires registered sex offenders to give authorities a list of their Internet providers and screen names. The initiative, passed Nov. 6 with 81% support, toughens penalties on those convicted of human trafficking.
The American Civil Liberties Union of Northern California and the Electronic Frontier Foundation sued in U.S. District Court in San Francisco on behalf of sex offenders. They argue that the requirement restricts offenders’ First Amendment right to free speech and their due-process and equal-protection rights under the 14th Amendment.
U.S. District Judge Thelton Henderson issued a temporary restraining order until there is a full hearing Nov. 20, saying there are “serious questions” of constitutional rights to be considered.
He noted in the four-page order, issued Nov. 7, that the state says it can’t enforce the provision until March, so there would be minimal harm in issuing a stay.
The lawsuit was filed on behalf of two anonymous registered sex offenders who otherwise would be required to disclose their Internet providers and screen names.
It does not challenge separate provisions in the measure that will more than double prison sentences for human trafficking and impose life sentences for the sex-trafficking of children.
“We do think we’ll prevail in the long run,” said ACLU staff attorney Michael Risher. “This law simply sweeps much too broadly, because it includes all 73,000 people who are required to register here in California.”
The list includes people who committed misdemeanor indecent exposure years ago or whose crimes never involved the Internet, he said.
A sex offender’s rights should be restricted only on an individual basis, Risher said, taking into account the offender’s history and likelihood of using the Internet to commit new crimes: “It can’t dump them all into a category.”
Dan Cohen, spokesman for the Yes on 35, said in a statement that the proponents “are confident the court will follow precedent and uphold the new sex offender registration reporting requirements to protect vulnerable women and children from exploitation.” They said such court challenges are common and have regularly been rejected by courts.
More articles related to Petition News | Speech News | ballot initiative, California, Internet, sex offenders, social networking.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
Both comments and pings are currently closed.
The First Amendment Center is an educational organization and cannot provide legal advice.
Ken Paulson is president of the First Amendment Center and dean of the College of Mass Communication at Middle Tennessee State University. He is also the former editor-in-chief of USA Today.
Gene Policinski, chief operating officer of the Newseum Institute, also is senior vice president of the First Amendment Center, a center of the institute. He is a veteran journalist whose career has included work in newspapers, radio, television and online.
John Seigenthaler founded the Newseum Institute’s First Amendment Center in 1991 with the mission of creating national discussion, dialogue and debate about First Amendment rights and values.
Dr. Charles C. Haynes is director of the Religious Freedom Center at the Newseum Institute.. He writes and speaks extensively on religious liberty and religion in American public life.
David L. Hudson Jr. is an expert in First Amendment issues and a regular contributor to the First Amendment Center's website. Hudson teaches law and was a scholar at the First Amendment Center.