First Amendment topicsAbout the First Amendment
News Story


Federal judge: Seattle police lacked cause in WTO arrests

By The Associated Press
01.01.04

SEATTLE — A federal judge has ruled that Seattle police were unfounded in their arrest of protesters during the World Trade Organization riots in late 1999.

The Dec. 29 decision by U.S. District Judge Marsha Pechman could leave the city vulnerable to a class-action lawsuit.

Pechman ruled that police had no probable cause when they arrested 157 protesters in downtown Seattle during the WTO conference held in December 1999.

The city maintained protesters were arrested for pedestrian interference only after they failed to disperse. Attorneys for the city could not be reached by The Seattle Times for comment for this report.

Protesters' lawyers argued that the arrests violated their clients' First and Fourth Amendment rights, guaranteeing free speech and protection from unreasonable searches and seizures.

Victoria Ni, an attorney with Trial Lawyers for Public Justice, said protesters and onlookers were trapped, herded and arrested by the Seattle Police Department outside of an area that had been established as a no-protest zone during the convention.

Protesters said they were forced down the street and arrested by police, who made no effort to separate the group from innocent bystanders, court documents said.

Plaintiffs' lawyers also contend all those arrested were booked into a holding center at Naval Station Puget Sound at Sand Point using the same photocopied arrest warrant and containing inaccurate information.

For example, all the forms were signed by one police lieutenant who later acknowledged that he had not made a single arrest himself.

Judge Pechman called the department's documentation of the arrests "atrocious," but warned that her ruling should not be interpreted to invalidate all mass arrests by police.

A class-action lawsuit was filed in October 2000 on behalf of about 600 people, but most of those claims were dismissed in fall 2001. U.S. District Judge Barbara Rothstein ruled the city was just in creating and enforcing a no-protest zone during a state of emergency. City officials created the zone after some protesters clogged the streets and damaged some property.

That ruling, however, would have no bearing on claims by the 157 current plaintiffs, who were outside the no-protest zone at the time of their arrest, said an assistant to Steve Berman, the protesters' lead attorney.

Pechman took over the case after Rothstein left the court this year to head a national center for judicial education and research in Washington, D.C.

A trial is scheduled for Jan. 20 to determine if the city is liable for damages. Protesters will have to prove the arrests were part of an official city policy, Ni said.

"We're going to show that the arrests were ratified and approved by the mayor or the chief of police," she said.

If the judge agrees, the issue of damages will be raised, she said, declining to speculate on the amount of possible damages sought.


 
print this   Print

$7 fee for Mo. driver, vehicle records halted

By The Associated Press
06.03.08

Editor's note: The Associated Press reported that Cole County Judge Patricia Joyce tossed out the new Missouri law capping how much the Department of Revenue could charge for driver's-license and motor-vehicle records. Joyce ruled Nov. 10 that the Legislature’s addition of the fee limit to a property-tax bill was unconstitutional. It was unclear what effect the decision would have on the cost of the fees.

JEFFERSON CITY, Mo. — A state judge has ordered the Department of Revenue to stop charging a higher fee for accessing driver's license and motor vehicle records, finding that the increased price violates the state Sunshine Law.

The Revenue Department on May 1 started charging $7 to get those records. Previously it charged $1.25 and a fraction of a cent for companies that bought large quantities of records in bulk.

Several businesses that buy the records in bulk sued, seeking a court order against the fee increase. The companies argued that the new cost violated state open-records laws, which limit the cost government entities can charge for copying records and providing them to the public.

State attorneys claimed a separate federal law governing motor vehicle records means that Missouri's Sunshine Law did not apply to vehicle and driver's license records, and the state could therefore charge whatever it deemed reasonable.

But Cole County Judge Richard Callahan, who interrupted testimony on May 29 to ask whether the state had any justification for the fee increase under the state Sunshine Law, disagreed.

Revenue Director Omar Davis said in a written statement that he was disappointed by the May 30 ruling, but that it was a preliminary decision and the department would continue defending the fee increase.

Driver's license and motor vehicle records are intended for law enforcement and not so businesses can buy them, and that the higher fee is a better estimate for the state's cost in maintaining them, Davis said.

Attorneys representing the companies and the state met privately with Callahan on May 30 before the temporary court order blocking the fee increase was announced. A hearing over a permanent court order is scheduled for June 20.

Department of Revenue documents obtained by the Associated Press through an open-records request show the department indicated in 2006 that an employee can process a record request in 3.5 minutes, which when divided by the employee's hourly wage, results in a record retrieval cost of 67 cents. The department also can charge 10 cents per page for a copy of the records, according to the Sunshine Law.

Davis earlier this year said that he didn't think driver's license and motor vehicle records fall under the Sunshine Law because there are limits on who can access them. He said the fee increase was a way to pay for a new computer system and would make the records more secure by prompting fewer companies to buy the information.

The Revenue Department in October signed a contract worth up to $50 million with Virginia-based BearingPoint Inc. to replace the state computer system for driver's license records. Davis said the department planned to pay for the new system with profits from driver's license and motor vehicle requests and by letting the consulting firm keep $1 from every record sale.

Department records show that equipment and maintenance of the system is projected to cost nearly $70 million by 2017.

Lawmakers, many of whom expressed concern about how the fee increase would affect insurance companies and other businesses, approved legislation capping any fee increase to a half cent per record.

Testimony on May 29 also focused on the harm that the suing businesses say they are suffering because of the fee increase. In the original lawsuit, executives for some of the companies said the higher fee would increase the cost for buying the records from tens of thousands of dollars to hundreds of millions.

The suing companies had used the data for a variety of purposes, such as tracking the history of used vehicles, telling schools and trucking companies when their drivers have received traffic violations, administering vehicle safety recalls and informing insurance companies when teenagers get their driver's license.

The companies, which had bought the state records weekly or monthly, stopped because of the higher cost.

The case is R.L. Polk vs. Missouri Department of Revenue, 08AC-CC00381.


Update
Mo. judge rejects revised fee for driver's license records
Court says 3.82 cents is still too high and violates state sunshine law requirement that agencies set 'reasonable' prices for providing copies of public records. 04.19.09

Previous
Businesses try to block fee increase for Mo. vehicle, driver data
Lawsuit claims price of $7 per record violates state open-records law as well as state, federal constitutions. 05.13.08

Related

Pa. records chief issues new fee schedule for copying files

Plan, which was created under state's expanded sunshine law, limits duplication charges to no more than 25 cents per page. 11.27.08

News summary page
View the latest news stories throughout the First Amendment Center Online.



Last system update: Tuesday, February 9, 2010 | 14:29:58
 SEARCH  MORE
About this site
About the First Amendment
About the First Amendment Center
How to contribute
Video/RSS/podcasts
First Amendment programs
State of the First Amendment
reports

Religious liberty in public schools
First Reports
Supreme Court
Columnists
Experts
First Amendment publications
First Amendment Center history
Glossary
Freedom Sings™
Events
First Amendment
Schools

Congressional Research Service reports
Guest editorials
FOI material
The First Amendment
Library

Lesson plans
freedomforum.org
Newseum
Contact us
Privacy statement
Related links