First Amendment topicsAbout the First Amendment
News Story
 
print this   Print

NYCLU demands review of GOP convention arrests

By The Associated Press
03.23.06

NEW YORK — A civil liberties group accused police yesterday of lying about the circumstances surrounding the arrests of hundreds of protesters during the Republican National Convention.

In a letter to police and prosecutors, the New York Civil Liberties Union demanded a review of cases brought against protesters arrested on Aug. 31, 2004, at demonstrations near the World Trade Center site and Union Square.

“We are concerned that false police statements may have tainted hundreds of cases of people arrested at the two largest mass arrests during the convention,” wrote the group’s attorney, Christopher Dunn.

City law officials have said the arrests were justified.

The accusations stem from a tense standoff in 2004 between police and the tens of thousands of demonstrators at the GOP convention, where President Bush accepted his party’s nomination for a second term.

While demonstrations were mostly peaceful, sporadic clashes between police and protesters resulted in more than 1,800 arrests, mostly on misdemeanor charges like obstructing government administration.

Up to 10,000 officers were deployed at the four-day event — a show of force the civil liberties group called overkill and a threat to free speech. Two pending federal lawsuits claim most of the arrests were illegal.

The group’s letter cited sworn statements by officers who said they were told by a supervisor, Deputy Inspector James Essig, that the protesters near Union Square had been warned to stop blocking traffic and disperse before the arrests began. About 400 people ended up in custody, including some rounded up with a mesh net.

During a deposition earlier this month, Essig testified that “at no time did he give an order to disperse nor did anyone else give such an order to disperse,” Dunn wrote.

The group contends the contradictory statements are grounds to dismiss cases and discipline police officers.

A spokeswoman for Manhattan District Attorney Robert Morgenthau said prosecutors “have been reviewing these arrests as the situations merit, and of course we’ll continue to do that.”

NYPD spokesman Paul Browne said police acted properly.


Update
FBI seeks help from NYCLU in probe of GOP convention arrests
Letter: Feds are investigating whether New York Police Department officers violated civil rights of protesters at 2004 gathering. 05.19.06

Related

NYCLU sues city, police over GOP convention arrests

Meanwhile, Manhattan district attorney's office asks court to drop charges against 227 anti-war protesters who were arrested during convention. 10.10.04

NYC accused of creating 'Guantanamo on the Hudson'

Attorney sues over GOP convention arrests, saying officials illegally rounded up, detained hundreds of people in 'single-minded goal to empty the streets of political protest.' 11.23.04

GOP convention protesters settle contempt claims against NYC
Officials agree to pay more than $230,000; in return, demonstrators drop claims that city was in contempt of court for not complying with judge's order to release detainees. 04.19.05

News summary page
View the latest news stories throughout the First Amendment Center Online.



Last system update: Saturday, November 21, 2009 | 00:44:46
 SEARCH  MORE
About this site
About the First Amendment
About the First Amendment Center
How to contribute
Video/RSS/podcasts
First Amendment programs
State of the First Amendment
reports

Religious liberty in public schools
First Reports
Supreme Court
Columnists
Experts
First Amendment publications
First Amendment Center history
Glossary
Freedom Sings™
Events
First Amendment
Schools

Congressional Research Service reports
Guest editorials
FOI material
The First Amendment
Library

Lesson plans
freedomforum.org
Newseum
Contact us
Privacy statement
Related links