First Amendment topicsAbout the First Amendment
News Story
 
print this   Print

Justice Dept. looks into NSA surveillance leak

By The Associated Press
01.03.06

WASHINGTON — The Justice Department has opened another investigation into leaks of classified information, this time to determine who divulged the existence of President Bush's secret domestic-spying program.

The inquiry focuses on disclosures to The New York Times about warrantless surveillance conducted by the National Security Agency since the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks, officials said.

The newspaper recently revealed the existence of the program in a front-page story that also acknowledged that the news had been withheld from publication for a year, partly at the request of the administration and partly because the newspaper wanted more time to confirm various aspects of the program.

White House spokesman Trent Duffy said Justice undertook the action on its own, and Bush was informed of it on Dec. 30.

"The leaking of classified information is a serious issue. The fact is that al-Qaida's playbook is not printed on Page One and when America's is, it has serious ramifications," Duffy told reporters in Crawford, Texas, where Bush was spending the holidays.

Catherine Mathis, a spokeswoman for the Times, would not comment.

Disclosure of the secret spying program two weeks ago brought criticism of the administration. Some critics accused the president of breaking the law by authorizing intercepts of conversations, without prior court approval or oversight, of people inside the United States and abroad who had suspected ties to al-Qaida or its affiliates.

Bush, who publicly acknowledged the program's existence and described how it operates, has argued that the initiative is legal in a time of war.

The inquiry launched Dec. 30 is only the most recent effort by the Bush administration to determine who is disclosing information to journalists.

Two years ago, a special counsel was named to investigate who inside the White House gave reporters the identity of CIA operative Valerie Plame, an effort that led to perjury and obstruction-of-justice charges against Vice President Dick Cheney's top aide, Lewis I. "Scooter" Libby.

More recently, the Justice Department has begun examining whether classified information was illegally disclosed to The Washington Post about a network of secret CIA prisons in Eastern Europe and elsewhere.

The NSA leak probe was launched after the Justice Department received a request from the spy agency.

It is unclear whether Attorney General Alberto Gonzales will recuse himself from the inquiry. He was White House counsel when Bush signed the executive order authorizing the NSA, which is normally confined to overseas operations, to spy on conversations taking place on American soil.

For the past two weeks, Gonzales also has been one of the administration's point men in arguing that the president has the constitutional authority to conduct the spying.

"It's pretty stunning that, rather than focus on whether the president broke his oath of office and broke federal law, they are going after the whistleblowers," said Anthony D. Romero, executive director of the American Civil Liberties Union.

But Sen. Charles Schumer, D-N.Y., appearing on "Fox News Sunday," said the Justice Department investigation should explore the motivation of the person who leaked the information.

"Was this somebody who had an ill purpose, trying to hurt the United States?" Schumer asked. "Or might it have been someone in the department who felt that this was wrong, legally wrong, that the law was being violated?"

Duke University law professor Scott Silliman said the Justice Department was taking the wrong approach.

"Somebody in the government has enough concern about this program that they are talking to reporters," Silliman said. "I don't think that is something the Justice Department should try to prosecute."

Douglas Kmiec, a Pepperdine University law professor, said the Justice probe was the next logical step because the NSA is alleging a violation of a law that prohibits disclosure of classified information.

"The Department of Justice has the general obligation to investigate suspected violations of the law," Kmiec said. "It would be extraordinary for the department not to take up this matter."

The NSA probe likely will result in a repeat of last summer's events in Washington, where reporters were subpoenaed to testify about who in the administration told them about Plame's work at the CIA. New York Times reporter Judith Miller spent 85 days in jail for refusing to reveal her sources.

Lucy Dalglish, executive director of the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press, said the Plame investigation was about "political gamesmanship." But she  said the NSA leak probe was frightening.

"In this case, there is no question that the public needed to know what the New York Times reported," she said. "It's much more of a classic whistleblower situation. The public needs to know when the government is engaged in things that may well be unconstitutional."

The surveillance program bypassed a nearly 30-year-old secret Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act court established to oversee highly sensitive investigations involving espionage and terrorism — after the FISA court began second-guessing Bush administration requests for surveillance warrants, according to press reports.

Administration officials insist that Bush has the power to conduct warrantless surveillance under the Constitution's war-powers provision. They argued that Congress also gave Bush the power when it authorized the use of military force against terrorists in a resolution adopted within days of the Sept. 11 attacks. And they say Congress had been briefed on the program.

Bush is standing firmly behind his domestic spying program, saying his decision to let the intelligence community listen in on phone calls Americans have with suspected terrorists is lawful and does not result in widespread domestic eavesdropping.

"The NSA program is one that listens to a few numbers," the president told reporters after visiting wounded troops and their families at Brooke Army Medical Center in San Antonio, Texas.

"In other words, the enemy is calling somebody and we want to know who they're calling and why," Bush said.


Update
Ex-NSA officer subpoenaed in leaks case
Grand jury summons Russell Tice, who talked to New York Times reporters about agency's eavesdropping antiterror program. 07.28.06

Related

Bob Novak claims president knows CIA leak source

Meanwhile, Sen. Charles Schumer is urging Bush to identify Novak's source or to say that he does not know who it is. 12.15.05

Bush defends domestic spying program

President discusses newly disclosed surveillance effort during year-end news conference, also urges Senate to renew Patriot Act. 12.19.05

Groups seek to halt domestic-spying program
Plaintiffs in federal lawsuits call National Security Agency program 'illegal and unconstitutional,' claim privacy, free-speech violations. 01.18.06

Federal judge orders eavesdropping documents released
Court sets 20-day deadline; meanwhile, GOP senator says White House has agreed to consider legislation, provide more information to Congress on spying program. 02.17.06

New York Times sues seeking eavesdropping documents
Newspaper asks court to order Defense Department to comply with FOIA request or provide lawful reason why it cannot. 02.28.06

Prying by the press exposes spying on Americans
By Paul K. McMasters We should be glad we have a news media that looks into how our freedoms fare in the war on terror. 01.01.06

Blowing the whistle can also blow a career
By Paul K. McMasters Government employees who disclose excesses and missteps are supposed to be protected; all too often they are frog-marched to punishment. 01.15.06

News summary page
View the latest news stories throughout the First Amendment Center Online.



Last system update: Friday, November 20, 2009 | 18:22:08
 SEARCH  MORE
About this site
About the First Amendment
About the First Amendment Center
How to contribute
Video/RSS/podcasts
First Amendment programs
State of the First Amendment
reports

Religious liberty in public schools
First Reports
Supreme Court
Columnists
Experts
First Amendment publications
First Amendment Center history
Glossary
Freedom Sings™
Events
First Amendment
Schools

Congressional Research Service reports
Guest editorials
FOI material
The First Amendment
Library

Lesson plans
freedomforum.org
Newseum
Contact us
Privacy statement
Related links