First Amendment topicsAbout the First Amendment
News Story
 
print this   Print

N.M. man sentenced for violating criminal-libel law

By The Associated Press
10.19.05

FARMINGTON, N.M. — A man convicted of the seldom-used charge of criminal libel was sentenced to 360 days in jail on that charge and charges of harassment and stalking, but the judge suspended the sentence.

Magistrate William Vincent also ordered Juan Mata yesterday to pay $114 in court costs and perform 50 hours of community service.

Mata’s attorney, Dennis Montoya of Albuquerque, filed an appeal of the convictions in district court in nearby Aztec immediately after sentencing.

The charges centered on whether Mata had a constitutional right to circulate a petition asking the Farmington Police Department to investigate Officer Mike Briseno and to picket the department with signs calling Briseno a liar.

Montoya has contended the city vindictively charged Mata after he filed a civil rights lawsuit against Farmington, Briseno and four other officers.

Montoya asked Vincent to vacate Mata’s convictions.

“I told the judge that this was his opportunity to do the right thing and to demonstrate to the whole country that the First Amendment was alive and well in Farmington,” Montoya said in a telephone conversation with the Associated Press.

Mata should have never been convicted Aug. 8 because the charges violate free-speech rights, the attorney said.

Assistant City Attorney William Cooke said yesterday he could not comment because the matter was under appeal.

Cooke has said in the past that Mata engaged in a personal vendetta.

“I’m extremely thankful we live in a country with free speech, but certain kinds of speech are not free,” Cooke said when Mata was convicted.

Briseno had testified that Mata’s actions were aimed at destroying his credibility, and said the man frightened him. Mata videotaped Briseno when the officer drove by Mata’s home, and drove by as the officer issued tickets elsewhere.

Montoya, however, alleged Mata has been subjected to harassment by Farmington police — most recently the night of Oct. 17, when he and his young nephew were followed home from shopping.

The department’s public affairs officer, Lt. Robert Miller, said Mata had not filed a complaint, “so I’m not really sure what he’s complaining about.”

The harassment and stalking charges stemmed from the petition and picketing. Montoya has said the criminal-libel charge referred to a letter written by another lawyer for Mata, Ron Adamson, which Mata didn’t even sign. The letter accused Briseno of 11 felonies and asked the department to investigate an alleged action by Briseno against Mata last year.

“Mr. Mata is in a Catch-22 situation,” Montoya said yesterday. “He was prosecuted for filing the equivalent of an internal affairs complaint. ... No one should have to be in this position in his own community and in his own home.”


Update
N.M. criminal-libel charge ruled unconstitutional
State judge finds man's criticism of police officer should be safeguarded as a basic liberty. 04.06.06

Related

Puerto Rico won't appeal ruling that struck down criminal-libel law

Federal appeals court finds statute is unconstitutional 'as applied to statements regarding public officials or figures,' conflicts with First Amendment. 01.28.03

'Howling Pig' back online after court ruling

Federal judge grants restraining order; Colorado police return editor Thomas Mink's computer. 01.12.04

10th Circuit asked to throw out Colo. criminal-libel law
Attorney for online newsletter editor who was threatened with prosecution under statute tells three-judge panel that law is so broad it can't be applied constitutionally. 01.14.06

Jailed for speech: Criminal libel is an old — and bad — idea
By Ken Paulson Poking fun at Colorado prof by doctoring his photo to look like KISS member is pure satire — it doesn't warrant confiscation of The Howling Pig newsletter publisher's computer. 01.18.04

The crime of speaking ill of your betters
By Paul K. McMasters Criminal-libel laws force defendants to face not individuals allegedly defamed, but the government as prosecutor and the taxpayer as underwriter. 11.06.05

Criminal Libel

News summary page
View the latest news stories throughout the First Amendment Center Online.



Last system update: Tuesday, February 9, 2010 | 14:18:17
 SEARCH  MORE
About this site
About the First Amendment
About the First Amendment Center
How to contribute
Video/RSS/podcasts
First Amendment programs
State of the First Amendment
reports

Religious liberty in public schools
First Reports
Supreme Court
Columnists
Experts
First Amendment publications
First Amendment Center history
Glossary
Freedom Sings™
Events
First Amendment
Schools

Congressional Research Service reports
Guest editorials
FOI material
The First Amendment
Library

Lesson plans
freedomforum.org
Newseum
Contact us
Privacy statement
Related links