First Amendment topicsAbout the First Amendment
News Story
 
print this   Print

Major leagues again try to banish book peddler

By The Associated Press
09.09.03

WASHINGTON — When lifelong hockey fan Mark G. Weinberg won a court case upholding his right to sell his highly critical book about Chicago Blackhawks owner Bill Wirtz outside the team's stadium, he scored it as a victory for the underdog.

But the Goliaths of sports have lined up against him, citing post-Sept. 11 security concerns in hope of persuading the U.S. Supreme Court to strip him of the win.

Major League Baseball, the National Hockey League, the National Basketball Association and the National Football League contend the ruling that overturned a 1995 peddling ordinance could allow terrorists bent on wreaking mayhem at a crowded Chicago sports event to disguise themselves as vendors.

"Remote though such dangers may be, they support deference to Chicago's ordinance," attorney Daniel Hildebrand wrote in a friend-of-the-court brief for the leagues and two Chicago sports facilities — the United Center, home of the Bulls and Blackhawks, and U.S. Cellular Field, home of the White Sox.

The Supreme Court is expected to decide this fall whether to schedule a hearing in the case or let the 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruling stand.

Weinberg, 41, a graduate of the University of Chicago law school who practices civil rights law, scoffs at the leagues' arguments.

"There's no reason to believe that peddlers are terrorists. It's absurd," he said. "The teams are using the fears associated with terrorism and 9/11 to selfishly foster their economic interests."

Wirtz and the leagues declined to comment.

The ordinance bans peddling of any merchandise, except newspapers, on public right of way within 1,000 feet of the United Center. It also requires anyone who wants to sell merchandise on private property within the area to hold a valid peddler's license.

City officials say the ordinance was passed to deal with congestion problems. The city also restricts peddling outside other arenas.

In December 2000, Weinberg began selling his 156-page, softcover book — Career Misconduct: The Story of Bill Wirtz's Greed, Corruption, and the Betrayal of Blackhawk Fans — for $13 outside the United Center.

Two months later, Chicago police ordered Weinberg to stop. He did, but only long enough to sue in federal court.

At first, a temporary restraining order allowed him to resume peddling his book, but then he was forced to stop again when a federal magistrate upheld the ordinance. The appeals court later overturned that ruling, calling the ordinance an impermissible prior restraint on free speech.

"The city has provided no objective evidence that traffic flow on the sidewalk or street is disrupted when Mr. Weinberg sells his book," the 7th Circuit said. "The city offered no empirical studies, no police records, no reported injuries, nor evidence of any lawsuits filed."

Jennifer Hoyle, a spokeswoman for the city, said Chicago's pursuit of Weinberg was based on "normal enforcement." She said the city appealed to the Supreme Court out of concern that peddlers will crowd the streets outside sports venues.

"The reason that (Weinberg) created no significant congestion was that everyone else was obeying the no-peddling law," the city argues in its high court brief. "The first illegal peddler will rarely pose significant problems, but that does not mean that he is entitled to any special immunity from regulation."

Weinberg, who previously targeted Blackhawks management when he created and sold alternative game programs outside the team's arena through most of the 1990s, said he expects the Supreme Court to vindicate him.

After that, he said, he plans to seek $50,000 in damages from the city, including an estimated $7,000 to cover lost book sales. He said he has sold 5,000 books so far, including 3,000 around the United Center.


Previous
Author vows to appeal decision upholding Chicago peddlers' ordinance
Mark Weinberg claims city's law, which prevents him from selling book outside arena, is unconstitutional. 02.21.02

Related

High court refuses several First Amendment cases

Justices' decision not to hear appeals means victory for Idaho newspaper, Chicago peddler, defeat for California salutatorian, Florida judge, Indiana attorney. 10.07.03

Icing free speech: A fan and the First Amendment

By Ken Paulson Sports leagues misguidedly try to stop Mark Weinberg from selling his book criticizing team owner near Chicago Blackhawks' stadium. 09.14.03

News summary page
View the latest news stories throughout the First Amendment Center Online.



Last system update: Tuesday, February 9, 2010 | 15:37:34
 SEARCH  MORE
About this site
About the First Amendment
About the First Amendment Center
How to contribute
Video/RSS/podcasts
First Amendment programs
State of the First Amendment
reports

Religious liberty in public schools
First Reports
Supreme Court
Columnists
Experts
First Amendment publications
First Amendment Center history
Glossary
Freedom Singsā„¢
Events
First Amendment
Schools

Congressional Research Service reports
Guest editorials
FOI material
The First Amendment
Library

Lesson plans
freedomforum.org
Newseum
Contact us
Privacy statement
Related links