|
|
|
Majority Opinion
|
Peckham, J. |
|
Lower Court
|
Distict of Columbia Court of Appeals |
|
Lower Court Ruling
|
Establishment Clause claim upheld. |
| Lawyers |
Assistant Attorney General Hoyt and Attorney General Griggs
|
|
| Ruling - Lower Court |
|
| News |
"Aims to Tie Up Funds: An Injunction Suit Affecting Catholic Institutions," The Washington Post, June 3, 1899, p. 12
|
"Anti-Catholic Suit Fails: Decision of United States Supreme Court as to an Appropriation," The New York Times, Dec. 5, 1899, p. 6
|
"Hearing Set for Bradfield's Protest," The Washington Post, Dec. 12, 1987, p. 2
|
"Hospital Case in Court," The Washington Post, Dec. 17, 1897, p. 1
|
"May Pay the Hospital: Congress and the Commissioners Sustained," The Washington Post, April 5, 1898
|
"Misuse of Federal Money: Its Appropriation for a Sectarian Hospital is Unconstitutional," The New York Times, Feb. 4, 1898, p. 3
|
"Providence Hospital Case Appealed," The Washington Post, April 6, 1898, p. 7
|
"Treasurer Roberts to Show Cause," The Washington Post, Nov. 23, 1897, p. 2
|
|
| Other |
Chemerinsky, Erwin, CONSTITUTIONAL LAW (3rd Ed.) (2006), p. 1245
|
|
| Commentary |
Bradfield, Joseph, "Law in the Hospital Case: President Madison's Attitude Regarding Sectarian Appropriations Recalled," The Washington Post, Sept. 2, 1897
|
|
| Books |
Witte, John Jr., RELIGION AND THE AMERICAN CONSTITUTIONAL EXPERIMENT (2006), p. 107, 171
|
|
|
|