|
  |
|
| | | Thomas v. Chicago Park District (2002)
[Findlaw]
First Amendment claim denied | |
Argument Date
| 12/03/2001 |
|---|
|
Decided
| 01/15/ 2002 |
|---|
|
Supreme Court Vote
| 9-0 |
|---|
|
Supreme Court Ruling
| First Amendment claim denied. |
|---|
|
|
| | | Issue | Where someone is denied a park permit to engage in protected expression, does the First Amendment require both prompt access to judicial review and prompt resolution, including prompt appellate resolution? Individual and group advocating legalization of marijuana challenge the denial of a permit to hold a demonstration in a Chicago park. Specifically, petitioners’ argue that the city’s permit procedure did not provide for timely or prompt judicial review of denials. | |
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Majority Opinion
|
per Scalia |
|
Certiorari Granted
|
05/29/2001 |
|
Lower Court
|
7th Circuit |
|
Lower Court Ruling
|
Affirmed Federal District Judge George M.Marovich’s denial of First Amendment claim |
|
Oral Arguments
|
Oral Arguments - Transcript
|
| Lawyers |
David Strauss & Steven A. Weiss, Schopf & Weiss
|
|
| Briefs |
|
| News Stories & Commentary |
|
| Panel - Lower Court |
Circuit Judge Frank Easterbrook
|
Circuit Judge John Coffey
|
Circuit Judge Richard Posner
|
|
| Tony Mauro Analysis |
|
| Opinion - Lower Court |
|
| Summary |
|
|
|