|
|
|
Majority Opinion
|
Powell, J. (Brennan, J. not participating) |
|
Concurring Opinion
|
Blackmun, J., & Marshall, J. (concurring in part and concurring in the judgment) |
|
Dissenting Opinion
|
Rehnquist, J. |
|
Lower Court
|
South Carolina Supreme Court |
|
Lower Court Ruling
|
First Amendment claim denied |
| Lawyers |
Richard B. Kale, Jr., Assistant Attorney General of South Carolina
|
|
| Briefs |
Girardeau A. Spann and Alan B. Morrison for Public Citizen et al.
|
Herbert M. Rosenthal and Stuart A. Forsyth for the State Bar of California
|
|
| Ruling - Lower Court |
268 S. C. 259, 233 S. E. 2d 301
|
|
| News |
Auerbach, Stuart, "Court Is Asked to Allow Lawyers to Solicit Clients,"The Washington Post, Jan. 17, 1978, Sect. A, p. 4
|
Falk, Carol H., "Top Court Bars Soliciting Law Clients For Fees, but Not for Public-Interest Case," The Wall Street Journal, May 31, 1978, p. 6
|
Fuller, Jack, "High Court Limits Lawyer Soliciting," The Chicago Tribune, May 31, 1978, p. 2
|
Hager, Philip, "Solicitation a Touchy Issue for Lawyers," The Los Angeles Times, Oct. 11, 1977, p. 1
|
Weaver, Warren, Jr., "Lawyers Given Guide on Soliciting Clients," The New York Times, May 31, 1978, p. 25
|
|
| Other |
"First Amendment: Attorney Solicitation," 69 J. of Criminal Law and Criminolgy 505 (1978)
|
Brody, Steven G. & Johnson, Bruce E. H., ADVERTISING AND COMMERCIAL SPEECH: A FIRST AMENDMENT GUIDE (2ND ED., 2006), sect. 3.9
|
|
|
|