Call for Strategic litigation to Stop Infringement of Petition Right via Photography;
Video Camera Surveillance Systems on Private Residential Property.

The State of California, and presumptively other states as well,  routinely illegally threatens to incarcerate property owners who photograph trespassers upon and users of their property even when the photography is by stationary video cameras which capture only events occurring within boundaries of the private property of the photographer.

Anyone else interested in coordinating strategic litigation which will stop this illegal infringement for every citizen protected by the Constitution is encouraged to contact fritzkoenig [at] hushmail [dot] com. In particular, methods of getting the issue into Federal Court are sought.

Video surveillance of anyone using property owned by the videographer is pursuant to First Amendment petition right as preparation for such petition by incidental photography to capture, collect, and communicate evidence of abusive use of that property. Simply put, operation of video surveillance cameras which capture events occurring within the boundaries of private property is constitutionally protected. Nevertheless, people are illegally enjoined from this activity by errant trial courts.

OftenThe State invokes this threat via the quick and dirty summary procedures of so-called civil harassment laws which were never designed to facilitate nor do they support the due process needed to mount a proper First Amendment defense nor conduct a proper First Amendment analysis even as most civil harassment laws explicitly acknowledge that “constitutionally protected” activity may not be enjoined.  Simply put, the civil harassment laws grant extraordinary power to trial court judges, are ripe for abuse, and provide a near perfect vehicle to circumvent constitutional protections of due process, free speech, and petition.

contact fritzkoenig [at] hushmail [dot] com to participate.

United States Army: 2.405
United States Navy: 746
United States Marine Corps: 297
United States Air Force: 17
Now take a close look at the fact that we have (unknown or secret: 9) this is the way they wanted it too be for what ever reason which are their own…. On top of this after civil war was over congress took back about 3000 MOH’s cause they were given so freely. Even today their are 4 people up for it but because of the job they do and maybe want to do after their tour of duty have their names with held… Their is a lot more at stake here then just one or a few liar;s
OK to me this is a liar, my opinion! Any one who said anything and then does not do what they have said! I think that take in to acount 98% of our own gov. The one thing on this is if you are running for office and say (promise) to do this or that when you get in and then you dont well now that is pure fraud, why cause you got the vote as payment to do what you said and you did’nt do it or even try too!!!

George Washington himself was the basis for the Stolen Valor Act – it’s pretty evident that the Founding Fathers never intended for lies and deceit to be covered as “free speech”.

Still there is the whole first amendment thing to consider so maybe we can just like add his name to a list of other liars, and like tar and feather him or something? That sounds fun.