MORE ARTICLES FROM ‘Religion Analysis’
To what extent do students have First Amendment rights? Recently, a three judge panel of the U.S. 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals has written another chapter in that debate by ruling in favor of a fifth grader who was barred by school officials from handing out invitations to a Christmas party at her church.
Federal judge rules for prisoner David Rentz II, who produced evidence that another inmate had been allowed to use religious oils before Rentz was denied his.
Federal appeals panel finds inmate failed to explain how denial of outdoor circle for Asatru ceremony violated his religious beliefs.
5th Circuit follows U.S. Supreme Court’s Hosanna-Tabor ruling, finds fired music director cannot pursue employment-discrimination claims.
4th Circuit panel says prison failed to explain why a Muslim prisoner’s 1/8-inch beard worn for religious reasons would pose a problem.
State appeals court finds ‘evidence that (Cary William) White’s marijuana use is based on more secular precepts.’
In Widmar v. Vincent, Justices said public universities can’t discriminate against student groups on the basis of their religious views.
Granting preliminary injunction, federal district judge calls school district’s criteria for allowing or disallowing student handouts to be ‘elusive’ and ‘too broad and vague to be considered reasonable.’
Man’s claim of religious reasons for renaming himself fails to sway appeals court in case involving whether a name change might harm public safety.
Prisoner in psychiatric hospital whose prayer book was temporarily taken away with other possessions fails to persuade federal judge that his religious freedom was violated.
Kansas high court: Judges must ensure that they don’t discriminate against a parent’s religious beliefs but also that they don’t ignore the harmful effects of certain religiously motivated conduct.
Panel rules that opening a school-board meeting with prayer is more like a graduation prayer, as students may be present, than a legislative prayer, as the board had argued.
Former New Hampshire prisoner’s religious-liberty arguments that the no-beards rule infringed on his Orthodox Jewish practice fails to sway panel.
Adherent of Odinism or Ahatru had contended that his religion required wooden or metal objects as opposed to alternatives provided by the prison.
Supreme Court ruling in Sossamon against lawsuits for money damages under RLUIPA, critics say, means states can avoid court scrutiny.