MORE ARTICLES FROM ‘Freedom Of The Press’
Student journalists at a Central Valley high school are getting a lesson in the First Amendment after administrators confiscated their newspaper over concerns about a campus safety article quoting school administrators as saying that recent lockdown drills and two reports of weapons on campus revealed poor communication.
A judge has declined to reconsider his ruling dismissing charges filed under California’s anti-paparazzi law which will trigger a full appeal before a panel of judges who have indicated they believe the law is constitutional.
The regulation of news racks and newspaper street sales presents an intriguing clash between newspaper publishers’ First Amendment rights and cities’ interests in aesthetics and safety.
You would think that if you are in a public space and you can see something — an object, a person, an incident — then you could also photograph or film it. The reality is not that simple.
Just in the last few years, some interesting stories have cropped up in the news concerning photographers. A [...]
Libel may be a private wrong or a public wrong (or perhaps both), depending on the identity of the party bringing suit and the type of remedy sought. As a private wrong, it involves an individual or small group claiming to have been defamed and suing for civil libel — also known [...]
For years the Internet has been hailed as a First Amendment fantasyland where freedom of expression could reach its zenith. U.S. District Judge Stewart Dalzell wrote in ACLU v. Reno, a leading Internet free-speech case that later reached the U.S. Supreme Court and dealt with the regulation of online pornography, that the [...]
“Privacy is the battleground of the future.” — Lee Levine, leading First Amendment attorney
Perhaps the greatest clash involving freedom speech has been the continuing collision between freedom of the press and the right to privacy. Many First Amendment advocates view this clash as the greatest threat to First Amendment freedoms. The press has been targeted [...]
Journalists throughout the country are wrestling with the impact of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act, a federal health-privacy law that went into effect April 14, 2003.1
Fortunately, HIPAA does not regulate what the news media can report about. Nonetheless, journalists should be prepared to deal with and, if necessary, challenge, the manner in which [...]
The First Amendment bars Congress from making any law abridging freedom of speech or of the press. These rights generally involve the dissemination of information, not the collection of it. Nevertheless, the Supreme Court said in Branzburg v. Hayes (1972) that the right to free press “could be eviscerated” if [...]
State shield statutes & leading cases
In 1972, the U.S. Supreme Court recognized in Branzburg v. Hayes that “news gathering is not without First Amendment protections.” The justices, however, could not agree about the form or breadth of those protections. As a result, no nationally recognized newsgatherer’s privilege exists. Instead, the protections currently in place for [...]
Few legal issues have generated such a wealth of case law and commentary as freedom of the press, so that my present overview cannot possibly be comprehensive. I accordingly focus on a topic that has long been important to me as a state court judge: the role of state constitutional law in preserving freedom of [...]
In 1884, Oliver Wendell Holmes, then a justice on the Massachusetts Supreme Court, held in Cowley v. Pulsifer (137 Mass. 392) that members of the public enjoy a right of access to civil trials. This right, he said, is rooted in democratic principles:
“It is desirable that the trial of [civil] causes should take place under [...]
Despite the passion of broadcasters’ arguments and improvements in their technology, courts so far have refused to recognize a First Amendment right to televise court proceedings. Whether trials can be broadcast thus has been left to the policymakers in the federal and state courts.
Perhaps not surprisingly, those policymakers have produced a wide variety of rules [...]
Delicate in neither name nor use, gag orders are becoming the judiciary’s favored means for controlling publicity about court proceedings.
Though gag orders take many forms, the most common is a trial judge’s order prohibiting the participants in a case — the parties, lawyers, law enforcement officials and witnesses — from talking to the news media. [...]
Although the authors of the First Amendment did not foresee the days when
radio microphones and television cameras would revolutionize the news and
entertainment industries, courts generally have had little problem extending the
freedom of the press to broadcasters.
Like print journalists, broadcasters enjoy freedom from prior restraint, the
right of access to court proceedings, and protections against chilling
defamation and [...]